Breaking windows means more work for glaziers which is good for the economy?

Besides, I thought high-sec existed to keep null-sec supplied? How does interrupting the high<->null supply chain help in that regard?

They attempted to. At least give them credit for that.

Stupidity is an amazingly powerful final boss, it has many Final Forms that you have to defeat like some horribly sadistic grinding game where you need to hit the level cap, grind the uberweapons and break your damage limits to even have a chance at surviving the final boss' first few "easy" forms.

I was thinking final fantasy really, I don't think WoW has damage limits?

But they's only the biggest boss for now, in the expansion, "Winter Expansion", the new dungeon will open up featuring the new new final bosses Ignorance and Willful Idiocy. This tag team is sure to keep you entertained and paying repair bills until -

You learn how to farm them.

I don't see why the freighters just don't log off. Unless they are AFK.

Yah... everyone knows Tippia is a goon alt... duh...

Right? I hate these moronic Goon alt OPs. [They Should] Stop Posting.

the ship model is currently pointing in a completley differnet direction

Very dumb question but how will a group of friends help a freighter in high sec? If people are ganking a freighter how does a group of friends help without ganking the ganker? (and thus get CONCORDED)

Really what this points to is the need for CCP to have a look at the collision mechanics.

An obelisk (with a mass of 940M Kg - over a Million tons folks) moving at 75 or 80M/Sec should really just muscle aside a 1M Kg noobship. Collisions should cause shield/armor/hull damage in proportion to the mass, velocity, and angle of impact. You don't see ships (even small ones) getting their courses altered by missile impacts, exploding warheads, or by a mass of uranium thrown at them by a battleship sized gun. That is why we have SHIELDS.

Me hopping into a stiletto and doing a 2Km/Sec head-on ram with a ship 1000x my size ought to result in me looking like a bug smashed on the windshield of a truck, and him taking shield damage via some formula fixing my mass, speed, and angle of impact to a number of points of damage.

If we are going to call out RAMMING SPEED - their ought to be some consequences for it.

Of course this does open up some interesting possibilities...

I see no downside to this.

Would be easy to implement a "you have to be outside the docking perimeter of a station" rule for this take effect. Solves that pretty easily. Stations are supposedly "managed traffic" areas (you have to ask permission to dock and undock) so we can assume that the station tractor beam takes care of collisions there.
Even on a mass Jita undock without that fix, everybody is on exactly the same heading, and comes out with full shields - so the shield damage from being muscled aside by the freighter or battleship that just undocked wouldn't be that bad.

Not that I care in the slightest about the OP, but I'd just like to point out that you are also blue to nearly every freighter ganking alliance in EvE, genius.

The solution to this is pretty simple. We need cloaky freighters. But dont make them suck and be like jfs which only have 1/3 the cargo of a normal freighter. Let them have at least 2/3 or so.

Screw it, let us have cloaky dictors.

However, I am prepared to offer protection for any freighters that require it for a small fee. You will put your freighter alts (mains for some of you....) into my corp. We will run freighters as groups with armed escorts. I have already setup 20 new accounts to multibox with and I have some friends ready to move their toons in as well.

IRONCLAD GUARANTEE:

If for ANY reason you are unsatisfied with our service, you may demand a no-questions asked 100% full refund within 30 days. I am absolutely convinced you will love our service so much

This is actually a petitionable offense. Permanent bumping on gates or stations is a no-no.

As it sounds from the OP the bumping is just to annoy the freighter pilot and force him log off as he cannot do anything else. Calling it "preparing for a gank" is a little far stretched, but I'll leave that to CCP to decide.

They also use log in traps, to trick people into thinking they're offline, the bumpers wait for a target and when one is found and held in place, the ganking characters are logged in to destroy it.

I hope you have first hand evidence to support your ::sperg:: outburst

simply, you are wrong I personally have GM petitions and responses on the topic [therefore I am an expert at bowling industrial capitals]

players were bored decided to play freighter bowling, test subject was continually bumped from gate to some offgrid point like 1700 km this went on for an hour, pilot cried in local, cried in private convo then began the petitioning process

unless it''s changed in the last 6 months then bump anybody as many times as you like with CCP blessings

Logged in ,undocked and cloaked for a long time, does that count?
So does this mean only large alliances are allowed to speak on the forum just so we all
understand the rules ?

So Noir. hasnt been in the news lately , whats your point?
I like whoring on big isk killmails , I admit it , shoot me

So in your opinion Noir. is not relevant in the world of eve, then why would bring this oppinion to a conversation about
Freighter losses. So I will ask again what was your original point to this statment if not to let me know my opinion does
not count because you don't like my alliance.

misconstrued heteronormative killboard **** measuring contests.

There really is no defense due to time and the bumper.

Suicide ganking to prevent suicide ganking is just nano gangs all over again
There should be no need to beat a playstyle by only using the same.
Also a gankable load is 1 bil isk.

You missed the part where I said it was done in under 30 secs.
What is the warp time for 200km on your escorts?

followed by locking and ecm?
And if everyone does somehow manage they still bring more ships.

These ganks are difficult borderline impossible to prevent given their time span.
If it were a minute, then yes your points would be true and I would concede victory.
The only one of worth is the one on value, make yourself to cheap to gank by hauling under 1 bil.
though if that be the case, I say freighters should receive a speed boost in warp to make up for such longer trips.
Or rig slots.
Rig slots would be excellent in these cases.

Also why a hulk?
I thought those were made of Captain America's shield adamantium for how ungankable they are post patch.

I'm not taking sides, but you explicitly mentioned the Hulk here.

EDIT:

Also we could really just empty quote this into the ground.

If you lose a ship because you decide that it's impractical to ensure it's protected, you deserve that loss.